Abstract: The purpose of this research is to analyze the nature of law enforcement of the crime of embezzlement of goods still tied to credit as fiduciary security: a case study in the jurisdiction of the South Sulawesi Regional Police. This study uses a juridical-empirical research method.This research will be carried out at the General Criminal Investigation Directorate of the South Sulawesi Regional Police with the consideration of the large number of criminal acts that occur in the South Sulawesi Regional Police area. The results of the study that the nature of law enforcement of the crime of embezzlement of goods that are still bound by credit as fiduciary guarantees with the principle of "constitutum possessorium (transfer of ownership of objects without giving up physical objects at all), is currently suspected to be still based on jurisprudential practice and does not guarantee legal certainty (legal certainty)..
KEY WORDS: Law Enforcement; Embezzlement; Fiduciary Guarantee.
[1]. Kharisma, DB (2015). Buy Back Guarantee and Development of Contemporary Guarantee Law in Indonesia. Private Law, 3(2), 164388.
[2]. Terok, G. (2013). Collateral Function in Lending. Lex Privatum, 1(5); 50-16.
[3]. Purbarani, FA, Rachmayanthy, R., & Yanto, O. (2020). The crime of participation in a fiduciary agreement in terms of Article 372 of the Criminal Code is linked to Article 35 of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary (Case Study on Pt. Prima Parama Mobilindo). Journal of Lex Specialis, 1(1); 71-79.
[4]. Mulyani, S. (2014). Construction of the concept of trademark rights in the legal system of fiduciary guarantees as an effort to support economic development. Legal Matters, 43(2), 213-223.
[5]. Yosi, W., Alfin, A., & Na'ali, B. (2019). COMPARISON OF LAW NUMBER 42 OF 1999 CONCERNING FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE WITH FATWA NUMBER 68/DSN-MUI/III/2008 CONCERNING RAHN TASJILY. Journal of Fuaduna: Journal of Religious and Social Studies, 2(2), 108-115.